Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald: Movie Review

Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald: Movie Review

Title: Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald

Author: J.K. Rowling

Rating: 4/5 stars

Everyone in the Harry Potter fandom has been on the edge of their seat waiting for this movie for two years. Hundreds of theories have been made during this time, based off of the Potter series, the last Fantastic Beasts film, and the small bits of information we’ve been getting for this one. This movie connects more to the Harry Potter series, what with Dumbledore, Hogwarts, and the big reveal from the final trailer: Nagini. Expectations were high, and I believe the movie met them.

Now, I’ve seen the movie twice already, and the whole time I was so tense and nervous about everything that was going on. This movie is much more intense and complicated than the last one; it’s like having a ton of information thrown in your face for two and a half hours straight. J.K. Rowling did say the first movie was to set up the characters and the story so the viewers got to know them, and this second movie would tie in a lot more with the Harry Potter series. I think it might tie in too much to the original series all at once. Everything seems to happen so fast, and the scenes keep switching between characters, so it’s pretty hard to keep up with.

Warning: There are spoilers beyond this point!

Let’s talk about the characters first. From the very beginning, Queenie seemed to be acting strangely, and not at all like herself. She cast the enchantment on Jacob and just wasn’t as upbeat as she had been in the first movie. I thought everything she did was very out of character for her, although I do understand why she went over to Grindelwald’s side; mostly because of her love for Jacob (speaking of which, their relationship was so cute, but so sad when they were fighting! I love how Jacob called Queenie all the pet names you can think of, aww.). I also think she felt pulled towards Grindelwald because, at the time when he talked to her, she was in a city she didn’t know, and had just lost track of both Tina and Jacob, and therefore didn’t know anyone in Paris. She was vulnerable (ugh, every time I say this word now, I think of the movie Elf, and it’s so annoying) and overwhelmed when Grindelwald reached out to her, and I understand her motives completely.

Which brings me to another amazing thing about this film: Grindelwald. He’s such a great character and villain! Unlike Voldemort, Grindelwald had the ability to love and he had emotions, so he seemed more human. In the Harry Potter books, Voldemort just went around killing everyone, which wasn’t very realistic, so wasn’t very scary. Grindelwald, however, didn’t kill whenever possible, and used words instead, to convince people to join his cause. When he was speaking, you could actually understand his reasoning, which made him a much more real, convincing, and scary villain. I was also a little worried at the end of the first movie that Johnny Depp would portray Grindelwald as half crazy, which Grindelwald wasn’t; he was Dumbledore’s equal, and very intelligent. But this movie proved my thinking wrong; although Grindelwald looked crazy, he didn’t sound crazy. I would still prefer someone other than Johnny Depp to play Grindelwald though (coughcoughCOLINFARRELLcoughcough).

Abernathy was suddenly working for Grindelwald in this movie and we didn’t get an explanation as to why. In the first movie, it seemed pretty clear he was against Grindelwald. Also, I couldn’t help but notice the names of future Death Eaters associated with Grindelwald: Travers, Rosier, and Carrow, as well as one other familiar name in the cast list, associated with the Ministry: Chang.

Someone we know was close to Grindelwald is Dumbledore, WHO IS AMAZING!!! Jude Law did a fantastic job of capturing Dumbledore’s character and spirit in this movie, and I don’t think it could have been any more perfect. As you might know, Dumbledore is one of my favourite characters in the Harry Potter series, and I was over the moon when I heard he would be in the Fantastic Beasts franchise. Dumbledore’s personality and essence seemed exactly the same to me, and several times made me laugh out loud at how perfectly Dumbledore he was. It was said by J.K. Rowling that Dumbledore wouldn’t be explicitly gay in this movie, but I thought it was pretty much as close as you could get without saying it. The scenes with young Dumbledore and young Grindelwald were pretty obviously romantic, as well as middle-aged Dumbledore’s reactions to them.

Dumbledore, in turn, was very close to Newt as well. My favourite character. Just as in the first movie, I loved Newt. He’s so relatable to me, as a Hufflepuff, and as a person in general. I’m still so happy the main character in this franchise is such a lovable Hufflepuff. I think the famous quote by Dumbledore, so similar to what he later says to Harry, describes Newt perfectly: “Do you know why I admire you, Newt? You do not seek power. You simply ask, ‘is a thing… right?'” Something I thought also fit Newt’s character well, and which I surprisingly liked, was how Newt doesn’t like picking sides. He sees the gray in everyone and knows that even though Grindelwald should not come to power, the Ministry should not necessarily be the one to defeat him. Young Newt was also so cute and looked exactly like older Newt ahhhh I love him!

Leta Lestrange was introduced in this movie, and I actually love her character! She was the Slytherin we all deserved to see. What I don’t understand, though, is why her father sent her to America from France, and then she somehow, for some reason, got to Scotland to go to Hogwarts when she was eleven. If she was in America, why not go to Ilvermorny? Now we might never know, since she died at the end of the movie, which I also don’t understand. She was such a great character, but they killed her off after only one movie? What was the point of that? She had such potential for playing a bigger part in the following movies, seeing as she didn’t do much in this one. The only reason Leta seemed to be in the movie was to create drama with the whole Theseus-Leta-Newt-Tina love square and to prove that Corvus Lestrange is, indeed, dead. Which leads to another character who I found very unnecessary, Yusuf Kama. He didn’t really do anything the whole movie besides explain his, Leta’s and Corvus’ story because he believed Credence was Corvus; but because Leta proved him wrong, pretty much all that information is pointless, and confused the audience. Who did he make an Unbreakable Vow with? And where did he go after he left Nicolas Flamel’s? Another unecessary character was Nagini. She was really just an onlooker during all the action, and the only information we got from her was that she was on the good side and that her and Credence had something going on. I do hope she’ll have a bigger part later on.

The big reveal at the end of the movie was that Credence is actually Aurelius Dumbledore. Now, we’ve never heard this name in the history of Harry Potter or anything about another Dumbledore child. I really hope J.K. Rowling didn’t just throw this in for dramatic effect and does actually have a good plan, backstory, and explanation for this character. I looked him up as soon as I got home from the movie, and my personal favourite theory is this: in the books, Albus was mentioned to have an aunt. In the credits of The Crimes of Grindelwald, there is a cast member listed as Credence’s aunt. The theory states that one of Albus, Aberforth, Ariana’s parents had another child with someone else and passed it off to the aunt so as not to tarnish the Dumbledore name. The aunt, in turn, brought the child to America for unknown reasons. I guess we’ll find out what really happened in the next movie, which is ANOTHER TWO YEARS AWAY! (And it’s so much worse than last time because everyone knew Jacob would get his memories back, but there are so many more unanswered questions in this movie.)

Next, the music is absolutely beautiful. I’ve become more and more entranced with movie soundtracks over the past couple years, and the Harry Potter and Fantastic Beasts ones are by far my favourites. Like the first movie, we hear a small excerpt of Hedwig’s Theme for the Warner Brothers logo, and the the Fantastic Beasts theme during the movie title. Hedwig’s Theme also plays when you get the first glimpse of Hogwarts, which is perfectly nostalgic. Throughout the film, you can hear tidbits of pieces from the first movie intertwined with new pieces, which is very creative and exciting to hear. I love how Newt Says Goodbye to Tina, from the soundtrack of the first movie, is incorporated into the scenes whenever Tina is mentioned, as well as when Newt is tracking her and during the Salamander Eyes scene.

Finally, the plot. One thing I noticed during the whole movie was the darkness. In the first movie, the music was mostly cheerful and upbeat, Newt wore a peacock blue coat and his Hufflepuff scarf during some parts, Queenie wore lots of pink, even Tina wore blue sometimes, and the scenery was also generally bright. In this movie, though, the music is more suspenseful, the lighting is darker, the costumes are less colourful (Newt’s blue coat is replaced with a gray one, I’m sad), and even Queenie’s hair is less curly. As J.K. Rowling said, the tone of this movie is much darker.

I found the opening scene of the movie very confusing. How did Grindelwald escape his cell to make Polyjuice potion and become Abernathy? We also had no idea what the blood pact vial is until later in the movie, and who was the lizard and where did Grindelwald get it? I’m guessing it would be simple enough to use a switching spell on Grindelwald and Abernathy’s tongues. The whole scene just happened so fast with little to no explanation, and was hard to keep up with.

We got to see Newt’s house in this movie, where he had so much space for all his beasts and it looked like his suitcase but in house form, and it was crazy! I am glad we got to meet at least a couple new beasts in this movie (like the kelpie and zouwu). Newt also hired someone to help with his beasts, unless he always had someone to help and we just didn’t see her in the last movie because it was set in New York. She quite obviously liked Newt, but I mean, who doesn’t? He’s my soulmate.

During the first half of the movie, Newt was obsessing over seeing Tina again, and was disappointed when he realized she didn’t come with Queenie and Jacob. On his way to Paris with Jacob, he was overthinking what he would say to her when he sees her, and Jacob tried to help him. Newt was so adorably and obviously in love with Tina the whole movie. The Salamander Eyes scene was SO CUTE! “I’m not supposed to say,” gets me every time. I love how the relationship between Newt and Tina is slowly building, instead of happening all at once. It fits their characters perfectly, especially Newt’s, and is different than what happens in most movies these days. It shows that the plot isn’t all about romance. The ‘they’re going to kiss!’ feeling was present during this scene as it was at the end of the first movie during the boat scene, but of course they got interrupted. I personally think (and hope) that Tina will make the first move.

I’m sure all of you noticed that Professor Minerva McGonagall was teaching at Hogwarts both at the time the movie took place (1927) and when Newt and Leta were attending (1910 – 1913). This should have been impossible since the McGonagall we know and love started working there in 1956. There are several theories on this, and I honestly don’t know what to think. I certainly believe J.K. Rowling put her in for a reason, though, because she would not have been able to overlook it. It could not have been an ancestor of McGonagall, since that was her father’s name, and he was a Muggle. It could have been an aunt on her father’s side who was previously unknown to us, but her distinct snappish personality was clear, and I personally think it’s the McGonagall from the Harry Potter series. The only question is, how? There is another theory that McGonagall was using time travel and her and Dumbledore had a secret past of working together for some important reason. This is a little far-fetched, but I truly don’t think J.K. Rowling would have included Professor McGonagall without an explanation.

One last thing: why have we never heard of Grindelwald’s different coloured eyes before? There was no mention of it in the books, and the young and old Grindelwald in the Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows movies both had two blue eyes. There must be a new plot twist it connects to since the Harry Potter movies, and I’m excited to find out what it is.

To sum up my review, here are some unanswered (for now) questions I’m sure everyone has after seeing this movie. Where is all this new kind of magic coming from and what exactly is it (referring to all the non-verbal spells and the magic Newt used to track Tina)? When and how did Abernathy start working for Grindelwald? What happened to Queenie during the year to make her act so differently? How did Newt just Apparate to the exact spot Dumbledore was standing when he was chasing after Dumbledore and Dumbledore Disapparated first? Why are all the Hallows included in the title but only the Elder Wand appeared in the film? What happened between Newt and Theseus to make their relationship so complicated? Why did Grindelwald and Dumbledore make the blood pact? How are there baby nifflers if the original niffler is male? What exactly was the point of including Leta Lestrange, Nagini, and Yusuf Kama in this movie? We still don’t know the whole story of Newt getting expelled from Hogwarts? How was Minerva McGonagall teaching at Hogwarts before she was born? WHO IS AURELIUS DUMBLEDORE?

Those were my thoughts on The Crimes of Grindelwald, and I would love to hear yours in the comments! The movie itself was a little hard to keep up with and confusing, and there were several details that kind of undermine what we already know about the Harry Potter universe, so I had to give it less than five stars. If, however, J.K. Rowling provides reasonable answers and explications for these inconsistencies either in an interview, on social media, or in the next movie, I will gladly up my rating. Overall, I did love the movie despite its flaws. The characters, music, and filming were all spectacular, and left me with a feeling of awe.

embed

Advertisements

The Harry Potter Spells Tag

The Harry Potter Spells Tag

I’m actually posting… what??? Yes, I know, I haven’t posted in a while, and I’m sorry. I’ve just been so busy, and I’m afraid my life is just going to be getting busier for the next few years. I’ll just be posting when I can and you guys are going to have to deal with it. (Sorry!)

I thought I would do this tag since it’s almost fall and fall is Harry Potter season (not that every season isn’t Harry Potter season), and also it just seems fun. 🙂


flagrate

thehazelwood

The Hazel Wood by Melissa Albert. I heard so many good things about this book, but it was honestly disappointing. I liked the ideas, but I thought the writing was bland.

alohomora

cinder

To say something other than Harry Potter… I would have to say Cinder by Marissa Meyer. This book was amazing and definitely made me decide to read the rest of the Lunar Chronicles series, which was also amazing.

accio

I have to pick two for this one; What If It’s Us by Becky Albertalli and Adam Silvera, and Archenemies by Marissa Meyer. Both these books come out in the fall, but I NEED TO READ THEM RIGHT NOW!

avada-kedavra

theshipofthedead.jpg

The Ship of the Dead by Rick Riordan is the third book in the series Magnus Chase and the Gods of Asgard and there are just SO MANY GOOD THINGS ABOUT IT AHHHH.

confundo

thecursedchild.jpg

I felt a lot of emotions while reading Harry Potter and the Cursed Child by J.K. Rowling, John Tiffany, and Jack Thorne, and confused was definitely one of them.

expectopatronum1

fangirl

Fangirl by Rainbow Rowell (although also a little Simon from Simon vs. the Homo Sapiens Agenda). Who doesn’t relate to this book?

sectumsempra

adropofnight

This made me think at first of Six of Crows by Leigh Bardugo, but I think A Drop of Night by Stephen Bachmann is a better option; it’s definitely more twisted.

expectopatronum2

rainbowmagic

I read so many Rainbow Magic books when I was little. They inspired so much creativeness and led me to wear sparkles to attract fairies. I loved these books so much! I will say, though, that once I got older, I realised that all Daisy Meadows’ books are the same story with the fairies’ names changed.

expelliarmus

thesunisalsoastar.jpg

I actually didn’t like Everything, Everything as much as everyone else seemed to, so I didn’t have high hopes for The Sun Is Also a Star by Nicola Yoon, but I actually loved it so much!

prior-incantato

thesonofneptune.jpg

Don’t worry, I have already read this book! I was reading it for the second because I read it so long ago, haha.

riddikulus

simonvsthehomosapiensagenda.jpg

I don’t really read humorous books, but Simon vs. the Homo Sapiens Agenda by Becky Albertalli is so relatable it makes me laugh. I also thought of Percy Jackson and the Olympians by Rick Riordan.

sonorus

illgiveyouthesun.jpg

A lot of awesome books I would have told you about a couple years ago have gained a lot of fame recently (The Lunar Chronicles by Marissa Meyer, Simon vs. the Homo Sapiens Agenda by Becky Albertalli, Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children by Ransom Riggs), so I’m going to say I’ll Give You the Sun by Jandy Nelson. It was just really good and different than other contemporary books I’ve read.

obliviate

thehalfbloodprince.jpg

SPOILER ALERT! (Even though everybody should have read Harry Potter now, you Muggles.) I overheard my mom reading part of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince by J.K. Rowling to my brother when I was little. Unfortunately, it was the part when Dumbledore dies.

imperio

anthem.jpg

We had to read Anthem by Ayn Rand for my grade 11 English class. I thought it was actually pretty interesting, and I like reading for school; I like being exposed to different kinds of books and being forced to read classics, because I probably never will on my own time.

crucio

swimthefly

Swim the Fly by Don Calame was another book I had to read for English class, but in grade 9. And let me tell you, the story was for 10th graders but the writing was for 7th graders. It was full of second-hand embarrassment, and I did not enjoy one second of it. History Is All You Left Me by Adam Silvera is another good one for this spell, but it was painful in a good way. I mean, not good, sad, but IT WAS SO GOOD ANYWAY! Just go read my review of it.


So, that was fun! Let me know if you have any comments about my choices, and tell me which book was a painful read for you! I have links to my social media, Goodreads, and fan fiction on my blog, so please check them out! Until next time! (Wow, that was a lot of exclamation points, oops!)

embed

History is All You Left Me by Adam Silvera: Book Review

History is All You Left Me by Adam Silvera: Book Review

Title: History is All You Left Me

Author: Adam Silvera

Rating: 4/5 stars

Genre: Contemporary

Back cover description

When Griffin’s first love and ex-boyfriend, Theo, dies in a drowning accident, his universe implodes. Even though Theo had moved to California for college and started seeing Jackson, Griffin never doubted Theo would come back to him when the time was right. But now, the future he’s been imagining for himself has gone far off course.

To make things worse, the only person who truly understands his heartache is Jackson. But no matter how much they open up to each other, Griffin’s downward spiral continues. He’s losing himself in his obsessive compulsions and destructive choices, and the secrets he’s been keeping are tearing him apart.

If Griffin is ever to rebuild his future, he must first confront his history, every last heartbreaking piece in the puzzle of his life.

My thoughts

This book is sad beginning through end, and I honestly didn’t think I would like it very much because it was so sad. However, it was beautifully written and emotionally complicated and realistic, and after a few days of thinking it over, I’ve decided I do like this book. It’s like when you’re scrolling through social media and you read a post and you think ‘huh that’s nice’ or ‘that’s cool’ and then you keep scrolling but a few seconds later you scroll back up because you’re still thinking about that post and you don’t know why exactly, but you have to repost it.

As I already said, I like how realistic this book is. The characters are all flawed, and I didn’t even really sympathize very much with Griffin. My favourite character by far was Wade, who was always trying to do the right thing and didn’t let his emotions rule over logic. It reminds me of the quote from Dumbledore: “There will be a time when we must choose between what is easy and what is right.” All the characters do or did something they regret during the story, and it’s usually the easy thing to do, not the right thing.

Adam Silvera’s writing in this book is a stark contrast to other contemporaries I’ve read; instead of being cute and fluffy, it’s neutral and sad, but appealing all the same. I’m excited to see what his other books are like.

embed

Leah on the Offbeat by Becky Albertalli: Book Review

Leah on the Offbeat by Becky Albertalli: Book Review

Title: Leah on the Offbeat

Author: Becky Albertalli

Rating: 4/5 stars

Genre: Contemporary

Back cover description

When it comes to drumming, Leah Burke is usually on beat—but real life isn’t always so rhythmic. An anomaly in her friend group, she’s the only child of a young, single mom, and her life is decidedly less privileged. She loves to draw but is too self-conscious to show it. And even though her mom knows she’s bisexual, she hasn’t mustered the courage to tell her friends—not even her openly gay BFF, Simon.

So Leah really doesn’t know what to do when her rock-solid friend group starts to fracture in unexpected ways. With prom and college on the horizon, tensions are running high. It’s hard for Leah to strike the right note while the people she loves are fighting—especially when she realizes she might love one of them more than she ever intended.

My thoughts

This was a really good book, I liked it a lot. There were so many references, and not just from Harry Potter (I caught some Percy Jackson and Gilmore Girls as well!), which I loved, loved, loved! It was super interesting to get to know Leah better and get a peek into her life, because we don’t see a lot of it in Simon.

Becky’s writing style is amazing, as always, because of the references that teens nowadays are definitely going to get and because she writes the way we speak. Like Simon, it’s just really relatable.

There were a couple things, however, that were not as good, in my opinion. While seeing inside Leah’s head was really cool, I can say that I liked the story from Simon’s point of view better. And I don’t think it’s just me wanting to see more Simon and Bram. A couple of the characters changed noticeably (Bram’s promposal was out of character for Bram, as was Nick auditioning for the play, let alone getting the lead), but especially Abby. I couldn’t imagine her as the same Abby from Simon at all, but that’s not necessarily a bad thing, because I think I understand why. Simon is so clueless, so it would make sense that he didn’t see this part of Abby in his own book, and that he didn’t see through Leah’s exterior personality, either. (SPOILER!) All the Leah and Abby moments seemed fan fiction-like to me (as well as Nick and Taylor and Garrett and Morgan getting together in university), and I’m not sure I really felt they were meant for each other. But that doesn’t mean I’m against the idea. It was cool to see that all the Leah-Abby awkwardness in Simon wasn’t because Leah liked Simon or Nick, but because she liked Abby. Huge twist, and again because Simon was so clueless. I honestly thought, though, that Leah and Garrett would be cute together. (UNSPOILER!)

Leah has a lot of confusing thoughts going through her mind, so I laughed and cried multiple times while reading this book, which is always fun, and the mark of a good author. The confusing thoughts were super relatable for the intended audience of this book, and I think the fact the Becky is a therapist helped with that a lot.

There were so many good scenes in this book, notably the times when Leah and Bram talked about Simon, when Garrett made prom night dinner reservations at the American Girl Bistro instead of the American Grill Bistro, and when Leah goes shopping with Wells.

Throughout the book, I realised how much Leah actually hung out with people other than Simon and Nick, because in Simon it seemed like they were her only best friends, and I thought this detail was really important to her character.

I think Simon is Becky’s best book so far, and Leah is a good sequel; it definitely adds to the first book. I 100% recommend reading it, but only if you’ve already read Simon because it will definitely spoil the entire plot!


I’m so happy I’ve read Leah already! Since I live in Canada, the release date is April 30th, but I preordered it and it came yesterday and I’ve been binge-reading it since last night. I haven’t gotten anything done, but it was totally worth it.

embed

The Ultimate Book Tag

The Ultimate Book Tag

Hey people of the Internet! I haven’t posted in a while (I’m always saying this, so you should probably just expect long gaps between posts. Also, here comes the life update of why I haven’t been posting:), because I went to Quebec and got my wisdom teeth out as well as all the usual stuff. But it’s now March break, and I haven’t done a book tag in a while, so I thought it would be fun to do one!


1. Do you get sick while reading in the car?

Unfortunately, yes.

2. Which author’s writing style is completely unique to you, and why?

This is so hard! Every author has a different writing style that I associate them with! But I think I’m going to have to say Becky Albertalli, because she writes like a teenager would talk, and not just in the dialogue. She makes the story so relatable!

3. Harry Potter series or the Twilight saga? Give three points to defend your answer.

Um… HARRY POTTER. One, because I’ve never read Twilight. Two, because magic. Three, because J.K. Rowling writes so well and makes the story believable and realistic.

4. Do you carry a book bag? If so, what is in it (besides books)?

Not really, but kind of? I always have a book in my backpack at school, but I never have one in my purse, and when I go for a car trip I bring a bag with my phone, headphones, charger, and a book in it.

5. Do you smell your books?

I do sometimes, when it’s a really good book or pretty old or really new.

6. Books with or without little illustrations?

With. They’re so cute, and they add a little art to the pages.

7. What book did you love while reading, but discovered later wasn’t quality writing?

Insurgent, Allegiant, and Mockingjay. I still love the ideas but I’ve reread them and realised they aren’t as great as I thought they were when I first read them.

8. Do you have any funny stories involving books from your childhood?

When I was little, I loved the Rainbow Magic books. My younger sister, our friend, and I made a club that wore sparkles to try to attract fairies and make them come out of hiding.

My brother and my friend read Harry Potter before I did, and they both begged me to read it. My mom thought I would love it too, but I absolutely refused to because I thought it was a book for boys because the main character was a boy (even though my friend who read it was a girl). I overheard my mom reading parts of them to my brother, though, and when I reread them now I can still remember what I was picturing as I listened when I was nine or ten. I finally started reading them (I forget what convinced me), and I am so happy I did.

9. What is the thinnest book on your shelf?

Milk and Honey by Rupi Kaur.

10. What is the thickest book on your shelf?

The Invention of Hugo Cabret by Brian Selznick.

11. Do you write as well as read? Do you see yourself in the future as being an author?

I do write as well, and hopefully I might someday be an author!

12. When did you get into reading?

I’ve been into reading since I was a baby. My mom has always loved books too, so she read to me all the time, and I remember in preschool always reading the books over and over again, to the point where the teachers didn’t want to read to me anymore. I became obsessed with reading, though, and collecting books and having a bookshelf and paying attention to authors and new books and things like that, after I read Harry Potter. That was also when I made my Instagram fan account.

13. What is your favourite classic book?

I’m pretty sure Harry Potter is considered a classic now, so definitely that. However, if we’re talking about really old classics, I haven’t read a lot, but Alice in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll is interesting.

14. In school, was your best subject Language Arts/English?

Well, I’m still in school, and almost all my classes are my best class. I definitely enjoy English, French, and Spanish classes more than my other classes, and I think I generally get slightly better marks in them.

15. If you were given a book as a present that you had read before and hated… what would you do?

I would say thank you and either put it on my shelf anyway (but not in a very prominent spot), or give it to someone who I thought would like it.

16. What is a lesser known series that you know of that is similar to Harry Potter or the Hunger Games?

This series is more well-known than it used to be, but The Lunar Chronicles by Marissa Meyer! Some other good series are Percy Jackson by Rick Riordan, The Giver by Lois Lowry, Legend by Marie Lu, and Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children by Ransom Riggs.

17. What is a bad habit you always do (besides rambling) while filming?

When I’m talking about something that I’m really passionate about, I tend to talk really loudly without noticing, and I talk a lot about it.

18. What is your favourite word?

I really like the word fizzle (it sounds just like the sound!) and bibliophile, because it sounds really intelligent, when you’re pretty much just talking about a fangirl.

19. Are you a nerd, dork, or dweeb? Or all of the above?

I think more nerd, but a little bit of all of the above. They’re almost the same thing, as I found out while googling exact definitions of each.

20. Vampires or fairies?

Fairies, because they’re magical and kind and they can fly. Vampires can kill you (not that fairies can’t, they just don’t usually want to).

21. Shapeshifters or angels? Why?

Angels, because I would like to believe there is life after death.

22. Spirits or werewolves? Why?

Spirits, again because I want to believe in heaven or something like it, and werewolves would, again, like to kill you. Plus, spirits are pretty interesting.

23. Zombies or vampires?

Zombies, I think, because they’ve been dead and would be interesting to talk to.

24. Love triangle or forbidden love?

A love triangle is so much more infuriating, and therefore so much more fun to read. You can choose sides and watch as the person who’s the point chooses one or the other.

25. AND FINALLY: full on romance books or action-packed with a few love scenes mixed in?

Full on romance. In romance books, I like to be able to concentrate only on the love story, and in action books only on the action. Although, I also like to have ships and small things like holding hands in action books.

embed

Love, Simon: Movie Review

Love, Simon: Movie Review

Title: Love, Simon

Rating: ★★★★★

OH. MY. GOD. I’VE BEEN WAITING FOR THIS MOVIE SINCE SEPTEMBER, WHEN I FIRST LEARNED IT WAS COMING OUT. (Aha, coming out.) I LAUGHED. I CRIED. I GOT BUTTERFLIES IN MY STOMACH AND I COULDN’T STOP SMILING. GO READ THE BOOK RIGHT NOW AND THEN GO WATCH THE MOVIE. YOU WILL NOT REGRET IT.

I want to watch Love, Simon again right now. I’m definitely going to see it again next weekend! It was so amazing, and almost exactly like the book! They changed a couple things and left out a couple things entirely, but it all worked perfectly. Wow. I wish I could just pour all my thoughts into the computer because there are so many things I want to talk about and I’m afraid I’m going to forget them all. So, as always, I’m sorry if it’s a bit of a mess.

Let’s try doing this in chronological order. I walked into the movie theater and the first thing I saw was a huge poster for Love, Simon that said, “Dear moviegoers, please form a line at the concessions. It doesn’t have to be straight.” which is literally perfect!!! And then the movie starts and I’m smiling and OH MY GOD SIMON’S ROOM. Can I please have it?? It has a chalkboard wall in a nook that fits his bed perfectly, and a desk and a bookshelf with The Upside of Unrequited on it (which, if you didn’t know, is also by Becky Albertalli).

I love how the emails worked in the movie, and I love how each time Simon thinks of Blue as someone different, we see Blue as a different person too. I was a little confused about this at first, but caught on after a little while.

I do wish Alice had been in the movie, and the talent show and the end after the talent show, but this ending was super perfect too. My friend said this about the ending and I totally agree: in language classes when writing stories, we’re always told to make the ending the beginning with the changes to the character’s normal life the story has made happen, and in this movie you could see that and it really worked and I loved it! SPOILER: At the beginning of the movie, Simon picks up Nick, Leah, four iced coffees, then Abby on the way to school, and at the end, he picks up Nick, Leah, five iced coffees, Abby, and Bram. UNSPOILER! AND IT WAS SO CUTE. LITERAL COUPLE GOALS HAPPENING IN THIS MOVIE I CAN’T STAND IT!!!! I was a little relieved the bar scene wasn’t in the movie, it would have been too much second-hand embarrassment.

The friendship between the characters was so perfect, and in a live video on Instagram, I found out that parts of the movie were actually just the actors being friends between takes, which is super awesome (like the part where they’re dancing in the car).

SPOILER: Also, I wish they hadn’t made Leah be in love with Simon. I wish they’d stuck with Nick. It would have been simpler and less sad, in my opinion. Although I forget if it’s even said directly in the book that Leah likes Nick, or if it’s just the impression you get? Hopefully, though, it’s Nick. There are definitely hints about it in the book, and it really doesn’t make sense about the whole Leah not liking Abby thing if it’s not Nick. UNSPOILER!

Mrs. Albright was totally awesome, and I just have to say that the vice-principal reminded me of Michael Scott from The Office.

One more thing I wish was in the movie is how Simon is a Harry Potter fan. I’m a huge Harry Potter fan, as you probably all know, and I love it when it’s mentioned in other books! The least they could have done was have him still dress as a Dementor for Halloween. I feel like that was a big part of Simon’s character, being a fanboy of Harry Potter, and I was really excited to see it on-screen.

The characters and actors were so perfect I really wanted to be friends with them too, and pretty much the whole movie was even better than I expected. It really reflected the book well and I think they did a really, really good job on it. I also think it’s so great that this movie is here and so huge because it’s the first movie I’ve heard of where the main character is gay and that’s the focus of the whole story. It’s just all so realistic and perfect. I wonder how many times I’ve said perfect in this review. Probably a lot.

embed

On ne va pas nous changer

J’ai Ă©crit ce poĂšme pour mon cours de français, encore une fois, et je voulais vous le partager puisque ça parle de la discrimination, et c’est un sujet que je tiens Ă  coeur.


On ne va pas nous changer

On ne peux pas changer qui on aime

Ni la couleur de notre peau

Les fleurs peuvent ĂȘtre emblĂšmes

De ce dont on parle Ă  propos

 

On ne peux pas changer d’oĂč on vient

Ni nos qualités faiblesses

Mais on peut choisir comment on agit

Et vous devriez y penser aussi

 

Si on vous dit

Que les humains sont des fleurs

Allez vous nous croire?

 

On aime tous les fleurs différents

On ne les jette pas

Parce qu’ils ont un pĂ©tal de moins

Parce qu’ils ont une teinte opposĂ©

On les met ensemble pour un bouquet

Si on aime tous les fleurs

Pourquoi pas les humains?

 

MĂȘme si on pouvait changer notre apparence

Comment est-ce que ça fait une différence

Pour vous?

 

On ne va pas changer notre genre

Pour vous

Ni notre religion

Vous ne faites pas la convergence

Avec nous

C’est plutît l’abolition

 

Les humains, comme les fleurs

Sont tous Ă©gaux

Pourquoi vous ne voyez pas ça?

 

On ne peut pas nous changer

On ne veut pas nous changer

On ne va pas nous changer

embed